paidContent.org - The Economics of Content

Current Story

Yahoo-Google: Antitrust Outcome Hinges On Market Definition: Is It Search Ads? Online Ads?

By Joseph Weisenthal - Tue 17 Jun 2008 06:15 AM PST

imageEven though they said it wasn’t required of them, Yahoo (NSDQ: YHOO) and Google are waiting 3.5 months before implementing their agreement, just to avoid any antitrust problems. So, will there be any problems? UBS analyst Ben Schachter hosted a call (closed to the press, unfortunately) on the matter yesterday with attorney Glenn Manishin of Duane Morris LLP. The key takeaway, from a summary report: It’s all about defining the market, which is often the case in situations like this (see: XM-Sirius). Is the market just search advertising? Or is it the broader world of online advertising? Or perhaps it should be the whole advertising industry. This is what regulators will chew over, and each of those possibilities gets progressively better for Yahoo-Google (NSDQ: GOOG).

If the market is defined as just search advertising that’s obviously the worst, and the deal could face stiff resistance. Google might already have monopoly-like market share even before this deal comes to fruition. If the market is defined more broadly as online advertising, then they should be okay. And if we’re talking the whole ad industry, that’s obviously the best. All in all, it doesn’t sound as though Manishin is particularly concerned that the deal will get held up.

-- So why the wait? If it wasn’t necessary, and the deal isn’t likely to trigger any alarms, why are they waiting 3.5 months? Manishin doesn’t see it as a bad omen. Basically, if they went ahead, and regulators wanted to look into it, the government would have to file a court injunction, and that’s when things start to look bad. Better to just take the time now and get it right with no hitches along the way. As for Microsoft’s (NSDQ: MSFT) inevitable attempts to block it, if it’s seen as self-serving, then they’ll have little effect, proving, basically, that there are competitors (just as the terrestrial broadcasters demonstrated that XM-Sirius had competition by complaining loudly). But, given Microsoft’s success at delaying Google-DoubleClick, the company does know how to stall a deal.

Posted in: Advertising, Companies, Google, Microsoft, Yahoo, Legal



Related Research from Alacrastore.com
3 Responses:
  • From stone Tue 17 Jun 2008 07:41 AM

    This deal is in trouble then because Google argued for these narrow buckets --- search, display, text, behavioral, etc. as they were fighting to get DoubleClick approved. Live by the sword die by the sword.

  • From David Tue 17 Jun 2008 06:36 PM

    Just watch Local.com (LOCM), Marchex (MCHX) and IACI’s Ask.com, all 3 should be in play in the next months.

  • From Nathalie Tue 24 Jun 2008 11:13 PM

    Google is also starting ads on TV after ads on mobile. In their annual report they are announcing adsense for radio, newspaper.... I think Google is everywhere now and it’s really important to start to think about its monopilistic position.
    I can find a detailed presentation and article analyzing Google strategy and position here: http://blog.bloobble.com/2008/06/google-union/ . “Google Union or the virtual communism of the digital age?”

Post Your Comment

Mobile Options

» Mobile App
» Mobile/WAP Site

Send a News Tip

About

paidContent.org, flagship of the ContentNext Media network, provides global coverage of the business of digital content.

Rafat Ali
Publisher & Co-Editor

Staci D. Kramer
Co-Editor

David Kaplan
Senior Correspondent

Joseph Weisenthal
Correspondent

Robert Andrews
U.K. Editor

Amanda Natividad
Editorial Producer

Online Ad Deals Report

Social Media Report

New Media/Interactive Job Listings

Post Job
More Jobs

Generous Supporters