paidContent.org - The Economics of Content

Current Story

New York Times To Close TimesSelect Effective Midnight Tuesday; Will Open Last 20 Years Of Archives

By Staci D. Kramer - Mon 17 Sep 2007 02:41 PM PST

imageNo more orange Ts on the content at NYTimes.com as of midnight Tuesday. We have confirmed that The New York Times (NYSE: NYT) Company is shutting down TimesSelect exactly two years after the premium service launched on September 18, 2005, opening access to all news and editorial columnists.  At the same time, much of the NYT’s archives—the past 20 years and the public domain years of 1851-1922—will be opened, Vivian Schiller, SVP and GM of NYTimes.com., told me in an interview earlier today.  Some content from 1923-1986 also will be available for free but the primary use of those years will be for e-commerce, Schiller said.

(The NYT’s coverage is here.)

Also opened for access: personalization tools including online research and storage tools like News Tracker and Times File. Schiller said Times Reader will continue to be a subscription product; the premium crossword service continues as well.

Schiller insisted, as she and other NYT execs have said before that TimesSelect was on plan, was bringing in $10 million in subscription revenue and was successful: “This is what is really important—it did work. It’s just a matter of as compared to what.”

In this case the “what” is the result of traffic increases from search-engine optimization (SEO) and the NYT’s belief that by opening millions of pages to search engines, that traffic growth will continue and with it, ad revenue growth. (American Express has signed on as the first advertiser for the newly accessible Opinions and Archives areas on NYTimes.com.) The SEO dates back to NYTCo’s acquisition of About.com. Since About.com’s SEO technology and expertise was applied, NYTimes.com has experienced triple-digit growth in unique visitors. From July 2005 to July 2006, internal logs showed an 87-percent increase in unique visitors compared with 21 percent the previous year over year. From July 2006 to July 2007, uniques increased another 23 percent on the larger base. The total increase in uniques during roughly the same two years that TimesSelect was in effect: 131 percent. 

Following the first year of growth, “we started to do the modeling.” Asked why they didn’t move then, Schiller said they wanted to see if the growth was sustained: “This was not a decision we took lightly. It’s been in the works for several months. We took our time to do the modeling; we considered several different factors.”

The change is because of what’s happened in the internet in the past two years—particularly the power of search.” She added later: “Think about this recipe—millions and millions of new documents, all seo’d, double-digit advertising growth.” The Times expects “the scale and the power of the revenue that would come from that over time” to replace the subscriptions revenue and then some.

For months, whenever the subject of TimesSelect has come up NYT executives had a fairly standard answer: the company continues to evaluate the best approach to NYTimes.com. Schiller told paidContent.org the initial decision to close TimesSelect was made “months ago” but that the company continued to evaluate models in the interim and that there was nothing to announce until now: “Having worked in four major media companies, I’ve seen decisions made and unmade.”

The timing was a coincidence, Schiller said, determined by when the NYT could have all the systems in place for refunds, customer communication and making the content accessible. All that will remain of TimesSelect by Wednesday will be the original content commissioned for the premium service. That, too, will be opened and, Schiller said, original content for the site will be expanded.

TimesSelect closes down with roughly 787,400 active subscribers: approximately 471,200 home delivery subscribers, 227,000 online-only paid subs, and 89,200 free academic subscriptions through TimesSelect University.

Update: The official announcement has just gone out. 

Posted in: Companies, NYT, Media, Newspapers


Related Research from Alacrastore.com

2 Responses:
  • From Jon Garfunkel Tue 18 Sep 2007 03:13 AM

    All true, but remember that the Times is getting an average, per print subscriber, of $500 in subsciption fees and $1000 in advertising to reach that subscriber. What are the comparable numbers for online?

    Ad revenue in the “Other” category was $4m in August (I presume that’s from NYT.com). We’ll see how the Sept. and Oct. numbers come out.

    While this may signal the end of tiered content for paying subscribers, it shouldn’t close the door on all tiered offerings. As a paying subscriber, I’d still like *some* online benefit, like less intrusive ads or unmoderated comment posting. Mobile users will be soon demanding the former. With the restricted bandwidh/screens, readers should not have to waste any space on ads (though I’d be happy as a clamshell phone to get ads show up *outside* my browsing experience to defray the mobile web charges).

  • From Moses Kagan Tue 18 Sep 2007 09:55 AM

    Seems like this may not be the best time for the Times to open up all this new inventory. Alleyinsider, among others, have been talking about the coming decline in adspend, which they argue is presaged by a decline in eCPMs at AOL. Lost subs rev plus declining CPMs = ouch. Check out moseskagan.com for more analysis.

Post Your Comment

Mobile Options

» Mobile App
» Mobile/WAP Site

Send a News Tip

About

paidContent.org, flagship of the ContentNext Media network, provides global coverage of the business of digital content.

Rafat Ali
Publisher & Co-Editor

Staci D. Kramer
Co-Editor

David Kaplan
Senior Correspondent

Joseph Weisenthal
Correspondent

Robert Andrews
U.K. Editor

Amanda Natividad
Editorial Producer

EconCeleb Conference - The Economics of Celebrity. July 23 at the Roosevelt Hotel in Hollywood

Featured Report - 2008 Social Media Deals Report

front page of report

The economics of social media continue to heat up, with ever more buzz created in new and growing market categories. This report examines the categories, number and size of investment and acquisitions into social media and the resulting value created from 2007 through 2008. Order your report today to analyze deals made by Yahoo, Disney, Google, AOL, CBS, Hearst, Microsoft and many more.

Learn more or purchase now.

New Media/Interactive Job Listings

Post Job
More Jobs

Generous Supporters