paidContent.org - The Economics of Content

Current Story

MySpace May Beat Yahoo On Pageviews, But Not When It Comes To Attracting Advertisers

By David Kaplan - Mon 19 Feb 2007 06:16 AM PST

A long article in Adweek examines how advertisers and media buyers consider the value of pageviews and uniques when deciding on where to place the bulk of their ad dollars. Eventually, Adweek says, it will come down to defining engagement and figuring out the value of word of mouth on the web. But right now, uniques rule in the minds of decision-makers, who bank on traditional media measurements like CPMs. Adweek wonders whether the trend in pageviews might affect the equation. Since pageviews for sites that rely on some form of user-content and social networking functions are outpacing traditional media brands, shouldn’t advertisers and media buyers follow the eyeballs and devote a proportionate number of ad dollars toward MySpace and its competitors? The turning point occurred back in November, as comScore Media Metrix showed that, for the first time, pageviews for News Corp.’s Fox Interactive Media outstripped those of Yahoo’s (due mostly to FIM’s inclusion of MySpace). While Yahoo’s pageviews dropped 9 percent decline to 38 billion, FIM rose 2 percent to 39.5 billion. The difference grew in December, with FIM posting 41.5 billion pageviews, while Yahoo trailed with less than 36 billion.
But Adweek doesn’t expect the shift in ad dollars to follow pageview trends just yet. One reason is the ratio of unique visitors to pageviews. An average visitor to MySpace during December cycled through 500 pages of content and spent one hour and 52 minutes on the site, according to data from Adweek-sibling Nielsen NetRatings. The typical Yahoo user—someone who uses email and checks stock quotes hourly—had only 290 pageviews. But the portal’s advantage comes when counting Yahoo’s more than 110 million unique visitors – nearly double MySpace’s uniques. Yahoo users also spent almost 50 percent more time on the site, averaging slightly more than three hours per person. The MySpace audience is spending less time per-page, racking up 4.5 pages per minute, as opposed to 1.6 pages per minute for the Yahoo audience.
Again, noting that advertisers and media buyers have been trained to value things like the number of specific viewers who watch a half-hour TV show in its entirety, that perspective has been invoked when determining the value of competing websites. In addition, when considering the short amount of time spent on a particular social net page, advertisers read those numbers as evidence that people who go to social nets are not disposed to look at ads.
So Yahoo’s pageviews—despite trending lower—are therefore worth more to advertisers than those on MySpace. However, if advertisers and social networks can get better at leveraging traffic to build deeper connections – and be able to somehow measure that engagement – with users, the pageview/uniques ratio may diminish in importance, Adweek concludes, noting that the above numbers represent “the ultimate technological expression of word-of-mouth, where people make connections to other people, entertainment and services through the most massive chat rooms ever built. And most of the online ad industry’s metrics don’t really get at that.”

Posted in: Advertising, Companies, News Corp., Yahoo



Related Research from Alacrastore.com
3 Responses:
  • From Jake Mon 19 Feb 2007 08:15 PM

    Sloppy reporting from both AdWeek and Mr. Kaplan. Yahoo’s page view totals have been slipping since they began using AJAX across the site, something that’s been well-documented across the net (see link below). This has no bearing on Yahoo’s traffic or its competitive position versus MySpace.

    http://www.micropersuasion.com/2006/12/the_iminent_dem.html

  • From John Boyle / SocialNext Tue 20 Feb 2007 01:59 PM

    Advertisers probably prefer Y! over MySpace because Y! controls what it’s content looks like, thus it’s safer for the advertiser’s brand. Whereas MySpace has little to no control over a majority of its page views.

  • From Rockwell Tue 20 Feb 2007 07:45 PM

    Bottom line is that agency buyers buy whatever their clients perceive as valuable. That’s it. If a buyer is fed a plausible story as to why an ad buy is worthwhile, they’ll feed it back to their client and the client will buy it. I’m frankly shocked that more publishers have not exploited this fact.

Post Your Comment

Mobile Options

» Mobile App
» Mobile/WAP Site

Send a News Tip

About

paidContent.org, flagship of the ContentNext Media network, provides global coverage of the business of digital content.

Rafat Ali
Publisher & Editor

Staci D. Kramer
Co-Editor

David Kaplan
Senior Correspondent

Robert Andrews
U.K. Editor

Amanda Natividad
Editorial Producer

FOBM Conference - Oct 28 | Edison Ballroom | NYC

New Media/Interactive Job Listings

Post Job
More Jobs

Generous Supporters