paidContent.org - The Economics of Content

Current Story

Updated: Fund Urges Ouster Of Comcast CEO Roberts; Wants Voting Structure Scrapped

By Joseph Weisenthal - Thu 17 Jan 2008 09:26 AM PST

Institutional money manager Chieftain Capital Management has sent a letter (pdf) to Comcast (NSDQ: CMCSA) urging the ouster of CEO Brian Roberts. The fund, which owns about 1.9 percent of the company, calls Roberts’ tenure a “Comcastrophe.” It’s also demanding that the company scrap its dual-voting structure, which it claims gives the Roberts family control of the company at the expense of shareholders owning 99 percent of the firm.

According to the fund’s SEC filings, Chieftain first took a stake in Comcast in mid-2002, around the time the company was trading at post-bubble lows. Since then, the fund has been steadily upping its stake each quarter or so, but the stock has now taken a round trip. After rising off of its lows, Comcast isn’t much higher now than when the fund first bought in. In fact, as the letter notes, the stock is now trading back where it was in 1998. Among its other complaints: Comcast’s late entry into digital voice, the $80 billion spent on acquisitions over the past decade and its bid for Disney (NYSE: DIS), which in Chieftain’s view, destroyed shareholders’ confidence in management.

In addition to the demands about Roberts and the voting structure, the company wants to see stricter fiscal discipline, changes to executive compensation and more money returned to shareholders in the form of buybacks or dividends. These are all complaints that other shareholders have voiced before. During CFO Michael Angelakis’ presentation at Citi’s media conference, he faced questions about the company’s acquisitive ways and its lack of a dividend.

Shareholders frequently demand that companies return more cash in dividends in buybacks, but they don’t always make sense long term. As Pali’s Rich Greenfield argues in response (reg req’d), Comcast is currently in a “war” with telecom and satellite rivals, meaning it needs to spend heavily to compete—not lever up by handing more cash to shareholders.

Update: During a CNBC appearance, Chieftain Capital head Glenn Greenberg disputed the suggestion that Comcast needs to spend heavily to compete, because the company is an incumbent with its infrastructure already in the ground. His key argument: Comcast is fundamentally a good business, but it’s squandered its money on acquisitions that haven’t delivered value to shareholders. As for how it hopes to get changes, when the family is in control, Chieftain has done a survey of other investors confirming its sentiment is shared, and it’s hoping the board will pay attention to it.

Posted in: Companies, Comcast, Money

Tags: brian roberts,


EconWomen, Oct. 29, 2008 | Edison Ballroom | New York City Our panels are jam-packed with top women’s media executives. Register: http://econwomen.eventbrite.com

Related Research from Alacrastore.com
1 Response:
  • From John Morosani Fri 18 Jan 2008 05:29 AM

    It never fails to amaze me that some otherwise sophistiated investors wake up to find themselves shocked!, shocked!, that managements in companies with dual share voting structures don’t always seem to do what’s in the common shareholder interest 24/7.  The bigger question to me is why they bought shares with limited voting power to begin with.  Things that appear cheaper than they should be are often that way for a reason.
    Good luck getting Mr. Brian to abandon his seat on the gravy train.

Post Your Comment

Mobile Options

» Mobile App
» Mobile/WAP Site

Send a News Tip

About

paidContent.org, flagship of the ContentNext Media network, provides global coverage of the business of digital content.

Rafat Ali
Publisher & Editor

Staci D. Kramer
Co-Editor

David Kaplan
Senior Correspondent

Robert Andrews
U.K. Editor

Amanda Natividad
Editorial Producer

FOBM Conference - Oct 28 | Edison Ballroom | NYC

New Media/Interactive Job Listings

Post Job
More Jobs

Generous Supporters