paidContent.org - The Economics of Content

Current Story

EMI and Infospace Reach Settlement on Ringtone Royalties Lawsuit

By Rafat Ali - Fri 04 Jul 2008 11:54 AM PST

EMI, in the midst of its own management reorg, has settled its ringtone royalties lawsuit with Infospace, though the terms were not disclosed. It did disclose the settlement in an SEC filing late yesterday. Infospace was sued by the music label in early 2007, to the tune of $100 million for underpaying royalties on using its music for ringtones. At that time it alleged that Infospace and its then-subsidiaries Moviso and Premium Wireless Services had been underpaying royalties and selling ringtones for songs to which they held no licensing rights...EMI’s publishing also alleged InfoSpace (NSDQ: INSP) was selling expressly restricted songs, such as John Lennon’s “Imagine,” and selling ringtones in worldwide markets where it had not been granted license. Since then Infospace has closed down or disposed off its mobile content related businesses.

EMI changed some parts of the lawsuit in August, and asked for lower damages. Infospace had filed a counterclaim. According to the SEC filing: “The EMI Parties charged that the Company breached two ringtone license agreements by underpaying royalties and infringed the EMI Parties’ copyrights by making unlicensed use of the EMI Parties’ works. The EMI Parties claimed in excess of $10 million in damages for the alleged breaches of contract, and claimed statutory damages for alleged copyright infringement of ‘many millions’ of dollars. The Company denied the EMI Parties’ allegations and counterclaimed for no less than $1.5 million based upon the EMI Parties’ alleged breach of contract and tortious interference.”

As for the settlement: “The Settlement Agreement concludes the EMI Litigation, and InfoSpace does not expect that the settlement reached with the EMI Parties pursuant to the Settlement Agreement will materially and adversely affect the Company’s business or results of operations.”

Posted in: Companies, InfoSpace, Music Labels, EMI, Entertainment, Mobile Music, Legal



Related Research from Alacrastore.com
2 Responses:
  • From Jerry Mandering Fri 04 Jul 2008 02:08 PM

    The labels, and publishers need to put more effort into streamlining their licensing and content delivery for third party use worldwide.

    This would not have been an issue if they had their stuff together.

  • From kimbjo Fri 15 Aug 2008 09:39 AM

    I don’t think you’re reading the news properly. The label walked away from the lawsuit. ie. the label was wrong. how do you go from 100 million to ‘shut up don’t talk about it it’s over’? By being a complete moron. They sued first and asked questions later. Typical music industry BS.

Post Your Comment

Mobile Options

» Mobile App
» Mobile/WAP Site

Send a News Tip

About

paidContent.org, flagship of the ContentNext Media network, provides global coverage of the business of digital content.

Rafat Ali
Publisher & Co-Editor

Staci D. Kramer
Co-Editor

David Kaplan
Senior Correspondent

Joseph Weisenthal
Correspondent

Robert Andrews
U.K. Editor

Amanda Natividad
Editorial Producer

Social Media Report

New Media/Interactive Job Listings

Post Job
More Jobs

Generous Supporters

ContentNext Headlines